Feasibility and acceptability of a diagnostic randomized clinical trial of bowel ultrasound in infants with suspected necrotizing enterocolitis.

We conducted a pilot diagnostic randomized clinical trial (RCT) to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of adding bowel ultrasound (BUS) to the diagnostic evaluation for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Infants ≤ 32 weeks' gestational age with NEC concern were randomized to undergo abdominal X-ray (AXR) or AXR + BUS. The primary outcome was study feasibility. Secondary outcomes included rates of NEC diagnosis and duration of treatment with bowel rest and antibiotics. A total of 56 infants were enrolled; 16 developed NEC concern and were randomized. Rates of recruitment (56/82 = 68%), retention (16/16 = 100%), and protocol compliance (126/127 = 99%) met pre-specified thresholds for feasibility. No significant differences in rates of NEC diagnosis were found between the two groups. Durations of bowel rest and antibiotic treatment were also similar.   Conclusion: Our study supports the feasibility of conducting a definitive diagnostic RCT to establish safety and efficacy of BUS for NEC.   Clinical trial registration: The study was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03963011). What is Known: • Bowel ultrasound (BUS) is increasingly being utilized as an adjunct to abdominal radiographs in evaluating for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). • The impact of BUS on patient outcomes is unknown. What is New: • A diagnostic randomized controlled trial study design to determine safety and effectiveness of adding BUS to NEC evaluation is feasible and acceptable.

Feasibility, acceptability, and potential effectiveness of an online expressive writing intervention for COVID-19 resilience.

BACKGROUND & PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted mental health in the general population. In this trial, our objective was to assess whether a 6-week expressive writing intervention improves resilience in a sample from the general population in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS & METHODS: This 6-week trial was conducted online. Eligible participants (n=63) were a sample of adults who self-identified as having been significantly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Perceived Stress Scale - 10-Item (PSS-10); Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale - Revised (CESD-R); Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI). RESULTS: Resilience measures (CD-RISC) increased from baseline (66.6 ± 14.9) to immediately post-intervention (73.0 ± 12.4; p=0.014; Cohen's d =0.31), and at a 1- month follow-up (72.9 ± 13.6; p=0.024; Cohen's d =0.28). Across the same timepoints, perceived stress scores (PSS-10) decreased from baseline (21.8 ± 6.6) to immediately post-intervention (18.3 ± 7.0; p=0.008; Cohen's d =0.41), and at the 1- month follow-up to (16.8 ± 6.7; p=0.0002; Cohen's d =0.56). Depression symptoms (CESD-R) decreased from baseline (23.3 ± 15.3) at 6 weeks (17.8 ± 15.4; p=0.058; Cohen's d =0.22), and 10 weeks (15.5 ± 12.7; p=0.004; Cohen's d =0.38). Posttraumatic growth (PTGI) increased from baseline (41.7 ± 23.4) at 6 weeks (55.8 ± 26.4; p=0.004; Cohen's d =0.44), and at the 1-month follow-up (55.9 ± 29.3; p=0.008; Cohen's d =0.49). CONCLUSION: An online expressive writing intervention was effective at improving resilience in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. NCT#: NCT04589104.

Guidelines for Ultrasound in the Radiology Department During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The coronavirus disease 2019 is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. The virus can be spread by close person-to-person contact primarily by respiratory droplets. Given the close proximity of the sonographer or sonologist with the patient during ultrasound examinations, special precautions should be taken to limit the exposure of radiology personnel to patients with coronavirus disease 2019 while still providing optimal patient care. Methods covered in this article include modified workflow, close scrutiny and prioritization of imaging orders, and design of targeted ultrasound protocols. These guidelines summarize the personal experience and insight of multiple colleagues who lead ultrasound sections or are experts in the field.